The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A non-canonical landscape of the microRNA system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel A Cipolla |
| Abstract |
Microribonucleic acids, best known as microRNAs or miRNAs, are small, non-coding RNAs with important regulatory roles in eukaryotic cells. Here, I present a broad review on highly relevant but generally non-depicted features of miRNAs, among which stand out the non-conventional miRNA seed sites, the unusual messenger RNA (mRNA) target regions, the non-canonical miRNA-guided mechanisms of gene expression regulation, and the recently identified new class of miRNA ligands. Furthermore, I address the miRNA uncommon genomic location, transcription, and subcellular localization. Altogether, these unusual features and roles place the miRNA system as a very diverse, complex, and intriguing biological mechanism. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,195,838
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,824
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,326
of 251,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#29
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.