↓ Skip to main content

DNA Damage Response and Autophagy: A Meaningful Partnership

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Damage Response and Autophagy: A Meaningful Partnership
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2016.00204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aristides G. Eliopoulos, Sophia Havaki, Vassilis G. Gorgoulis

Abstract

Autophagy and the DNA damage response (DDR) are biological processes essential for cellular and organismal homeostasis. Herein, we summarize and discuss emerging evidence linking DDR to autophagy. We highlight published data suggesting that autophagy is activated by DNA damage and is required for several functional outcomes of DDR signaling, including repair of DNA lesions, senescence, cell death, and cytokine secretion. Uncovering the mechanisms by which autophagy and DDR are intertwined provides novel insight into the pathobiology of conditions associated with accumulation of DNA damage, including cancer and aging, and novel concepts for the development of improved therapeutic strategies against these pathologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,990,344
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#441
of 13,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,897
of 426,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,488 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.