↓ Skip to main content

Breaking Immunological Tolerance in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breaking Immunological Tolerance in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elmar Pieterse, Johan van der Vlag

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a fairly heterogeneous autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that mainly affects women in the childbearing age. SLE is a prototype type III hypersensitivity reaction in which immune complex depositions cause inflammation and tissue damage in multiple organs. Two distinct cell death pathways, apoptosis and NETosis, gained a great deal of interest among scientists, since both processes seem to be deregulated in SLE. There is growing evidence that histone modifications induced by these cell death pathways exert a central role in the induction of autoimmunity. In the current review, we discuss how abnormalities in apoptosis, NETosis, and histone modifications may lead to a break of immunological tolerance in SLE.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,863,399
of 26,504,585 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,753
of 33,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,625
of 242,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#84
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,504,585 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.