The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neutrophil-Derived Cytokines: Facts Beyond Expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00508 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Tecchio, Alessandra Micheletti, Marco A. Cassatella |
| Abstract |
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils, besides their involvement in primary defense against infections - mainly through phagocytosis, generation of toxic molecules, release of enzymes, and formation of extracellular traps - are also becoming increasingly important for their contribution to the fine regulation in development of inflammatory and immune responses. These latter functions of neutrophils occur, in part, via their de novo production and release of a large variety of cytokines, including chemotactic cytokines (chemokines). Accordingly, the improvement in technologies for molecular and functional cell analysis, along with concomitant advances in cell purification techniques, have allowed the identification of a continuously growing list of neutrophil-derived cytokines, as well as the characterization of their biological implications in vitro and/or in vivo. This short review summarizes crucial concepts regarding the modalities of expression, release, and regulation of neutrophil-derived cytokines. It also highlights examples illustrating the potential implications of neutrophil-derived cytokines according to recent observations made in humans and/or in experimental animal models. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 726 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 163 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 101 | 14% |
| Researcher | 93 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 100 | 14% |
| Unknown | 163 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 126 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 110 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 73 | 10% |
| Unknown | 191 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,556
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,101
of 273,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#56
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.