↓ Skip to main content

Uterine Microbiota: Residents, Tourists, or Invaders?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uterine Microbiota: Residents, Tourists, or Invaders?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00208
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Baker, Dana M. Chase, Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz

Abstract

Uterine microbiota have been reported under various conditions and populations; however, it is uncertain the level to which these bacteria are residents that maintain homeostasis, tourists that are readily eliminated or invaders that contribute to human disease. This review provides a historical timeline and summarizes the current status of this topic with the aim of promoting research priorities and discussion on this controversial topic. Discrepancies exist in current reports of uterine microbiota and are critically reviewed and examined. Established and putative routes of bacterial seeding of the human uterus and interactions with distal mucosal sites are discussed. Based upon the current literature, we highlight the need for additional robust clinical and translational studies in this area. In addition, we discuss the necessity for investigating host-microbiota interactions and the physiologic and functional impact of these microbiota on the local endometrial microenvironment as these mechanisms may influence poor reproductive, obstetric, and gynecologic health outcomes and sequelae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 385 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Master 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 143 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 3%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 168 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#993,004
of 26,080,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#879
of 32,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,799
of 349,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#19
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.