The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hyperuricemia contributes to glucose intolerance of hepatic inflammatory macrophages and impairs the insulin signaling pathway via IRS2-proteasome degradation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.931087 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hairong Zhao, Jiaming Lu, Furong He, Mei Wang, Yunbo Yan, Binyang Chen, De Xie, Chenxi Xu, Qiang Wang, Weidong Liu, Wei Yu, Yuemei Xi, Linqian Yu, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Hidenori Koyama, Wei Wang, Chenggui Zhang, Jidong Cheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#21,566,851
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,920
of 33,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,087
of 439,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#1,558
of 2,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.