You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Blueprint for an Inclusive, Global Deep-Sea Ocean Decade Field Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.584861 |
| Authors |
Kerry L. Howell, Ana Hilário, A. Louise Allcock, David M. Bailey, Maria Baker, Malcolm R. Clark, Ana Colaço, Jon Copley, Erik E. Cordes, Roberto Danovaro, Awantha Dissanayake, Elva Escobar, Patricia Esquete, Austin J. Gallagher, Andrew R. Gates, Sylvie M. Gaudron, Christopher R. German, Kristina M. Gjerde, Nicholas D. Higgs, Nadine Le Bris, Lisa A. Levin, Elisabetta Manea, Craig McClain, Lenaick Menot, Nelia C. Mestre, Anna Metaxas, Rosanna J. Milligan, Agnes W. N. Muthumbi, Bhavani E. Narayanaswamy, Sofia P. Ramalho, Eva Ramirez-Llodra, Laura M. Robson, Alex D. Rogers, Javier Sellanes, Julia D. Sigwart, Kerry Sink, Paul V. R. Snelgrove, Paris V. Stefanoudis, Paulo Y. Sumida, Michelle L. Taylor, Andrew R. Thurber, Rui P. Vieira, Hiromi K. Watanabe, Lucy C. Woodall, Joana R. Xavier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 19% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Portugal | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 52% |
| Scientists | 55 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#325,567
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#190
of 10,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,140
of 525,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#9
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.