↓ Skip to main content

Physiology of Hyperuricemia and Urate-Lowering Treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiology of Hyperuricemia and Urate-Lowering Treatments
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline L. Benn, Pinky Dua, Rachel Gurrell, Peter Loudon, Andrew Pike, R. Ian Storer, Ciara Vangjeli

Abstract

Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and is a multifactorial disease typically characterized by hyperuricemia and monosodium urate crystal deposition predominantly in, but not limited to, the joints and the urinary tract. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia has increased in developed countries over the past two decades and research into the area has become progressively more active. We review the current field of knowledge with emphasis on active areas of hyperuricemia research including the underlying physiology, genetics and epidemiology, with a focus on studies which suggest association of hyperuricemia with common comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Finally, we discuss current therapies and emerging drug discovery efforts aimed at delivering an optimized clinical treatment strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 331 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 15%
Student > Master 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 17 5%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 129 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 6%
Chemistry 17 5%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 136 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,844,585
of 26,134,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,368
of 7,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,778
of 346,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#46
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,134,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.