↓ Skip to main content

Fungal Polysaccharides: Biological Activity Beyond the Usual Structural Properties

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fungal Polysaccharides: Biological Activity Beyond the Usual Structural Properties
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcio L. Rodrigues, Leonardo Nimrichter, Radames J. B. Cordero, Arturo Casadevall

Abstract

Studies on structure and function of polysaccharides in biological systems classically involve sequence and compositional analyses, anomeric configuration, type of glycosidic linkage, and presence of substituents. Recent studies, however, indicates that other structural parameters, so far little explored, can directly influence the biological activity of microbial polysaccharides. Among these parameters, we highlight the molecular dimensions of Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharides, which appear to be inversely correlated with their immunobiological activity. These recent observations raise new concepts about the structure and function of polysaccharides, which stimulates the design of new experimental approaches and suggests previously unknown applications.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Chemistry 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18,982
of 24,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,884
of 180,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.