The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversifying of Chemical Structure of Native Monascus Pigments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lujie Liu, Jixing Zhao, Yaolin Huang, Qiao Xin, Zhilong Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,405
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,454
of 437,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#265
of 614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.