↓ Skip to main content

Beating Naive Bayes at Taxonomic Classification of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beating Naive Bayes at Taxonomic Classification of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.644487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Ziemski, Treepop Wisanwanichthan, Nicholas A. Bokulich, Benjamin D. Kaehler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,673,538
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,835
of 26,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,169
of 448,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#258
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.