↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in the Human AAA+ Chaperone p97 and Related Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in the Human AAA+ Chaperone p97 and Related Diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Kwan Tang, Di Xia

Abstract

A number of neurodegenerative diseases have been linked to mutations in the human protein p97, an abundant cytosolic AAA(+) (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) ATPase, that functions in a large number of cellular pathways. With the assistance of a variety of cofactors and adaptor proteins, p97 couples the energy of ATP hydrolysis to conformational changes that are necessary for its function. Disease-linked mutations, which are found at the interface between two main domains of p97, have been shown to alter the function of the protein, although the pathogenic mutations do not appear to alter the structure of individual subunit of p97 or the formation of the hexameric biological unit. While exactly how pathogenic mutations alter the cellular function of p97 remains unknown, functional, biochemical and structural differences between wild-type and pathogenic mutants of p97 are being identified. Here, we summarize recent progress in the study of p97 pathogenic mutants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,826,759
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,684
of 3,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,749
of 416,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.