↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity of Brain Networks in a Randomized Intervention Trial of Exercise Training in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
964 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasticity of Brain Networks in a Randomized Intervention Trial of Exercise Training in Older Adults
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle W. Voss, Ruchika S. Prakash, Kirk I. Erickson, Chandramallika Basak, Laura Chaddock, Jennifer S. Kim, Heloisa Alves, Susie Heo, Amanda N. Szabo, Siobhan M. White, Thomas R. Wójcicki, Emily L. Mailey, Neha Gothe, Erin A. Olson, Edward McAuley, Arthur F. Kramer

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 964 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 912 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 186 19%
Researcher 131 14%
Student > Master 124 13%
Student > Bachelor 106 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 73 8%
Other 182 19%
Unknown 162 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 241 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 128 13%
Neuroscience 116 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 7%
Sports and Recreations 62 6%
Other 138 14%
Unknown 212 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#255,707
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#62
of 5,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#820
of 179,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.