The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Rewarding Nature of Social Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sören Krach, Frieder M. Paulus, Maren Bodden, Tilo Kircher |
| Abstract |
The objective of this short review is to highlight rewarding aspects of social interactions for humans and discuss their neural basis. Thereby we report recent research findings to illustrate how social stimuli in general are processed in the reward system and highlight the role of Theory of Mind as one mediating process for experiencing social reward during social interactions. In conclusion we discuss clinical implications for psychiatry and psychotherapy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 96 | 21% |
| Researcher | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 89 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 138 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 59 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 102 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#133,861
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#31
of 3,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385
of 172,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.