The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of High-intensity Functional Training (HIFT) on Spatial Learning, Visual Pattern Separation and Attention Span in Adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.577390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tavor Ben-Zeev, Tamir Hirsh, Inbal Weiss, Michael Gornstein, Eitan Okun |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 22% |
| Psychology | 14 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,236,580
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,789
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,369
of 402,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#28
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.