The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Progressive Demyelination in the Presence of Serum Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-IgG: A Case Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2018.00340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Gil-Perotin, Jéssica Castillo-Villalba, Joan Carreres-Polo, Arantxa Navarré-Gimeno, Javier Mallada-Frechín, Francisco Pérez-Miralles, Francisco Gascón, Carmen Alcalá-Vicente, Laura Cubas-Nuñez, Bonaventura Casanova-Estruch |
| Abstract |
The clinical diagnosis of patients with autoantibodies directed to conformational myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein MOG-IgG, can be challenging because of atypical clinical presentation. MOG-IgG seropositivity has been reported in several demyelinating diseases, including relapsing opticospinal syndromes [in the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and less frequently, in multiple sclerosis (MS)], but it has rarely been associated with the progressive course of disease. To contribute to the characterization of MOG-related demyelination, we describe the case of a patient with progressive demyelinating opticospinal disease, IgG-oligoclonal bands (OCB), and serum MOG-IgG. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,312,490
of 25,014,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,093
of 14,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,786
of 333,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#105
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,014,758 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.