You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: General and Perceived Fatigue Does Not Depend on Corticospinal Tract Dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Mordillo-Mateos, Vanesa Soto-Leon, Marta Torres-Pareja, Diego Peinado-Palomino, Nuria Mendoza-Laiz, Carlos Alonso-Bonilla, Michele Dileone, Mario Rotondi, Juan Aguilar, Antonio Oliviero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 75% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,512,626
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#528
of 12,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,683
of 352,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#23
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.