↓ Skip to main content

Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: motor imagery and observational balance training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: motor imagery and observational balance training
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Taube, Michael Lorch, Sibylle Zeiter, Martin Keller

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 162 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Neuroscience 18 11%
Psychology 11 7%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 48 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,593,944
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,321
of 7,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,817
of 362,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#152
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.