You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00308 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Iacozza, Antje S. Meyer, Shiri Lev-Ari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Comoros | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 38% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,439,078
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,910
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,518
of 353,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#24
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.