The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High-Resolution Transcranial Electrical Simulation for Living Mice Based on Magneto-Acoustic Effect
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01342 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoqing Zhou, Shikun Liu, Yuexiang Wang, Tao Yin, Zhuo Yang, Zhipeng Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 12 | 29% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,138,066
of 26,315,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,078
of 11,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,327
of 485,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#132
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,315,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.