You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kang-Yong Zheng, Guang-Yan Dai, Yue Lan, Xue-Qiang Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,555,951
of 26,148,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,138
of 11,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,584
of 386,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#143
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,148,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.