You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Potential of Millets for Managing and Reducing the Risk of Developing Diabetes Mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.687428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seetha Anitha, Joanna Kane-Potaka, Takuji W. Tsusaka, Rosemary Botha, Ananthan Rajendran, D. Ian Givens, Devraj J. Parasannanavar, Kowsalya Subramaniam, Kanaka Durga Veera Prasad, Mani Vetriventhan, Raj Kumar Bhandari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 9 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 86 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 92 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#81,660
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#51
of 7,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,495
of 445,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.