You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk–Benefit Assessment of Consumption of Rice for Adult Men in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.694370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiqin Fang, Quantao Zhang, Shengjie Zhang, Tongwei Zhang, Feng Pan, Yufeng Cui, Sofie Theresa Thomsen, Lea S. Jakobsen, Aidong Liu, Sara M. Pires |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,681,914
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,099
of 4,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,410
of 436,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#77
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.