The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparison of the effects of resistant starch types on glycemic response in individuals with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1118229 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer E. Pugh, Mingzhu Cai, Nunzia Altieri, Gary Frost |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#512,766
of 26,559,802 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#272
of 7,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,595
of 431,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#12
of 509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.