↓ Skip to main content

Association of soy intake and cooking methods with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the extended Lanxi pre-colorectal cancer cohort (LP3C)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of soy intake and cooking methods with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the extended Lanxi pre-colorectal cancer cohort (LP3C)
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1390143
Authors

Weifang Zheng, Xunan Lin, Meng Zhu, Hao Ye, Xiaodong Hu, Xiaohui Liu, Lixiang Hu, Youyou Zheng, Peiling Hu, Pan Zhuang, Jingjing Jiao, Yu Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,497,883
of 26,175,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,372
of 7,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,410
of 151,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#100
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,175,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.