The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The negative association between the docosapentaenoic acid intake and the incidence of AMD based on NHANES 2005–2008
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1435775 |
| Authors |
Baiwei Xu, Yi Hu, Jie Di, Zhongwei Liu, Ziyan Yu, Lin Han, Yuan Ning |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,951,018
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,484
of 7,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,360
of 154,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#42
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.