↓ Skip to main content

Current Management Strategies in Breast Cancer by Targeting Key Altered Molecular Players

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Management Strategies in Breast Cancer by Targeting Key Altered Molecular Players
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2016.00045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shazia Ali, Neelima Mondal, Hani Choudhry, Mahmood Rasool, Peter N. Pushparaj, Mohammad A. Khan, Maryam Mahfooz, Ghufrana A. Sami, Jummanah Jarullah, Ashraf Ali, Mohammad S. Jamal

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second largest disease affecting women worldwide. It remains the most frequently reported and leading cause of death among women in both developed and developing countries. Tamoxifen and raloxifene are commonly used selective estrogen receptor modulators for treatment of breast cancer in women with high risk, although resistance occurs by tamoxifen after 5 years of therapy and both drugs cause uterine cancer and thromboembolic events. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are one of the optional modes used for breast cancer treatment. The combination of AIs along with tamoxifen can also be beneficial. Various therapeutic agents from different sources are being studied, which further need to be improved for potential outcome. For this, clinical trials based on large number of patients with optimal dose and lesser side effects have to be more in practice. Despite the clinical trials going on, there is need of better molecular models, which can identify high risk population, new agents with better benefit having less side effects, and improved biomarkers for treating breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,537,399
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,590
of 22,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,413
of 314,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#56
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,896 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.