↓ Skip to main content

Cell Adhesion and Matrix Stiffness: Coordinating Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
80 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
517 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell Adhesion and Matrix Stiffness: Coordinating Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasiliki Gkretsi, Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos

Abstract

Metastasis is a multistep process in which tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) and cancer cell cytoskeleton interactions are pivotal. ECM is connected, through integrins, to the cell's adhesome at cell-ECM adhesion sites and through them to the actin cytoskeleton and various downstream signaling pathways that enable the cell to respond to external stimuli in a coordinated manner. Cues from cell-adhesion proteins are fundamental for defining the invasive potential of cancer cells, and many of these proteins have been proposed as potent targets for inhibiting cancer cell invasion and thus, metastasis. In addition, ECM accumulation is quite frequent within the tumor microenvironment leading in many cases to an intense fibrotic response, known as desmoplasia, and tumor stiffening. Stiffening is not only required for the tumor to be able to displace the host tissue and grow in size but also contributes to cell-ECM interactions and can promote cancer cell invasion to surrounding tissues. Here, we review the role of cell adhesion and matrix stiffness in cancer cell invasion and metastasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 517 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 22%
Student > Master 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 59 11%
Unknown 157 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 142 27%
Engineering 50 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 179 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#937,024
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#154
of 23,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,839
of 344,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#8
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.