↓ Skip to main content

The role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Gammella, Federica Maccarinelli, Paolo Buratti, Stefania Recalcati, Gaetano Cairo

Abstract

The clinical use of the antitumor anthracycline Doxorubicin is limited by the risk of severe cardiotoxicity. The mechanisms underlying anthracycline-dependent cardiotoxicity are multiple and remain uncompletely understood, but many observations indicate that interactions with cellular iron metabolism are important. Convincing evidence showing that iron plays a role in Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity is provided by the protecting efficacy of iron chelation in patients and experimental models, and studies showing that iron overload exacerbates the cardiotoxic effects of the drug, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be completely characterized. Since anthracyclines generate reactive oxygen species, increased iron-catalyzed formation of free radicals appears an obvious explanation for the aggravating role of iron in Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, but antioxidants did not offer protection in clinical settings. Moreover, how the interaction between reactive oxygen species and iron damages heart cells exposed to Doxorubicin is still unclear. This review discusses the pathogenic role of the disruption of iron homeostasis in Doxorubicin-mediated cardiotoxicity in the context of current and future pharmacologic approaches to cardioprotection.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 12%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 41 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,293,574
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,128
of 17,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,821
of 314,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.