The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2013.00315 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mehedi Hasan, Stefania Brocca, Elena Sacco, Michela Spinelli, Elena Papaleo, Matteo Lambrughi, Lilia Alberghina, Marco Vanoni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 34% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,760
of 13,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,634
of 306,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#63
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.