You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy and Precision of the COSMED K5 Portable Analyser
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ismael Perez-Suarez, Marcos Martin-Rincon, Juan José Gonzalez-Henriquez, Chiara Fezzardi, Sergio Perez-Regalado, Victor Galvan-Alvarez, Julian W. Juan-Habib, David Morales-Alamo, Jose A. L. Calbet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 24% |
| Engineering | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,908,697
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,550
of 13,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,217
of 435,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#60
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.