The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Tissue Flossing on the Healthy and Impaired Musculoskeletal System: A Scoping Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.666129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Konrad, Richard Močnik, Masatoshi Nakamura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,572,032
of 26,368,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#861
of 15,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,570
of 463,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#25
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.