This paper describes and summarizes approaches for visualization and statistical analysis using data from Ralstonia solanacearum infection experiments based on methods and concepts that are broadly applicable. Members of the R. solanacearum species complex cause bacterial wilt disease. Bacterial wilt is a lethal plant disease and has been studied for over 100 years. During this time various methods to quantify disease and different ways to analyze the generated data have been employed. Here, I aim to provide a general background on three distinct and commonly used measures of disease: the area under the disease progression curve, longitudinal recordings of disease severity and host survival. I will discuss how one can proceed with visualization, statistical analysis, and interpretation using different datasets while revisiting the general concepts of statistical analysis. Datasets and R code to perform all analyses discussed here are included in the supplement.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,401,464
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#427
of 24,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,691
of 324,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
