↓ Skip to main content

Protein Extraction Methods Shape Much of the Extracted Proteomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein Extraction Methods Shape Much of the Extracted Proteomes
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liangjie Niu, Huayi Yuan, Fangping Gong, Xiaolin Wu, Wei Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 14%
Chemistry 8 6%
Unspecified 3 2%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 44 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,902,615
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,261
of 20,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,287
of 328,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#145
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,683 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.