You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuroimaging and psychophysiological investigation of the link between anxiety, enhanced affective reactivity and interoception in people with joint hypermobility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Núria Mallorquí-Bagué, Sarah N. Garfinkel, Miriam Engels, Jessica A. Eccles, Guillem Pailhez, Antonio Bulbena, Hugo D. Critchley |
| Abstract |
Anxiety is associated with increased physiological reactivity and also increased "interoceptive" sensitivity to such changes in internal bodily arousal. Joint hypermobility, an expression of a common variation in the connective tissue protein collagen, is increasingly recognized as a risk factor to anxiety and related disorders. This study explored the link between anxiety, interoceptive sensitivity and hypermobility in a sub-clinical population using neuroimaging and psychophysiological evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,363,843
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,635
of 32,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,005
of 260,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#79
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.