↓ Skip to main content

Children’s Non-symbolic and Symbolic Numerical Representations and Their Associations With Mathematical Ability

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Children’s Non-symbolic and Symbolic Numerical Representations and Their Associations With Mathematical Ability
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanjun Li, Meng Zhang, Yinghe Chen, Zhijun Deng, Xiaoshuang Zhu, Shijia Yan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 36%
Mathematics 7 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,981,606
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,082
of 35,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,878
of 345,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#115
of 711 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 711 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.