↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Local and Global Ordering Strategies in Number Line Estimation in Early Childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Use of Local and Global Ordering Strategies in Number Line Estimation in Early Childhood
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaccoline E. Van ’t Noordende, M. J. M. Volman, Paul P. M. Leseman, Korbinian Moeller, Tanja Dackermann, Evelyn H. Kroesbergen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,634
of 30,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,062
of 341,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#611
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.