↓ Skip to main content

Football Players Do Not Show “Neural Efficiency” in Cortical Activity Related to Visuospatial Information Processing During Football Scenes: An EEG Mapping Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Football Players Do Not Show “Neural Efficiency” in Cortical Activity Related to Visuospatial Information Processing During Football Scenes: An EEG Mapping Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00890
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Del Percio, Mauro Franzetti, Adelaide Josy De Matti, Giuseppe Noce, Roberta Lizio, Susanna Lopez, Andrea Soricelli, Raffaele Ferri, Maria Teresa Pascarelli, Marco Rizzo, Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Fabrizio Stocchi, Cristina Limatola, Claudio Babiloni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 23 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 23%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Psychology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 27 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,290,814
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,511
of 30,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,244
of 349,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#334
of 647 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 647 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.