↓ Skip to main content

Reflective Practice: A Method to Improve Teachers’ Well-Being. A Longitudinal Training in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflective Practice: A Method to Improve Teachers’ Well-Being. A Longitudinal Training in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ada Cigala, Elena Venturelli, Martina Bassetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Lecturer 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 19%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Unspecified 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Linguistics 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 33 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,185
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,144
of 34,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,261
of 482,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#253
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.