The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Work schedule flexibility and teleworking were not good together during COVID-19 when testing their effects on work overload and mental health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesús Yeves, Mariana Bargsted, Cristian Torres-Ochoa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 17% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,715,671
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,716
of 31,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,752
of 445,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#451
of 1,883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.