↓ Skip to main content

The paradoxical effects of high involvement work practices on employees and service outcomes: a trichromatic perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The paradoxical effects of high involvement work practices on employees and service outcomes: a trichromatic perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoxi Yang, Alia Qadir, Bilal Shahid, Safdar Husain Tahir

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 14%
Psychology 2 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,819,111
of 26,488,282 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#17,654
of 35,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,213
of 354,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#181
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,488,282 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.