↓ Skip to main content

Depression and the Link with Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depression and the Link with Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arup K. Dhar, David A. Barton

Abstract

This review provides an outline of the association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Much is known about the two individual clinical conditions; however, it is not until recently, biological mechanisms have been uncovered that link both MDD and CHD. The activation of stress pathways have been implicated as a neurochemical mechanism that links MDD and CHD. Depression is known to be associated with poorer outcomes of CHD. Psychological factors, such as major depression and stress, are now known as risk factors for developing CHD, which is as important and is independent of classic risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cigarette smoking. Both conditions have great socioeconomic importance given that depression and CHD are likely to be two of the three leading causes of global burden of disease. Better understanding of the common causal pathways will help us delineate more appropriate treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 451 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 78 17%
Unknown 144 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 9%
Psychology 40 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Neuroscience 19 4%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 163 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#227,892
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#148
of 11,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,272
of 304,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.