↓ Skip to main content

Two-Person Approaches to Studying Social Interaction in Psychiatry: Uses and Clinical Relevance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-Person Approaches to Studying Social Interaction in Psychiatry: Uses and Clinical Relevance
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yafeng Pan, Xiaojun Cheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 31 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 29%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,087,529
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,336
of 12,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,388
of 381,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#126
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.