↓ Skip to main content

Racial Disparities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of the Role of Biologic and Non-biologic Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racial Disparities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of the Role of Biologic and Non-biologic Factors
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.576964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Om Prakash, Fokhrul Hossain, Denise Danos, Adam Lassak, Richard Scribner, Lucio Miele

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 64 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 72 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,063,177
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#449
of 10,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,634
of 504,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#32
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.