↓ Skip to main content

Iterative Design and Evaluation of a Tangible Robot-Assisted Handwriting Activity for Special Education

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iterative Design and Evaluation of a Tangible Robot-Assisted Handwriting Activity for Special Education
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2020.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arzu Guneysu Ozgur, Ayberk Özgür, Thibault Asselborn, Wafa Johal, Elmira Yadollahi, Barbara Bruno, Melissa Skweres, Pierre Dillenbourg

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 27 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 16%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Linguistics 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 28 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,674,006
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#702
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,060
of 362,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#33
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.