↓ Skip to main content

Grand Challenges in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sensors, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Grand Challenges in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors
Published in
Frontiers in Sensors, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fsens.2020.583822
Authors

Celia Ferrag, Kagan Kerman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 17%
Engineering 9 13%
Materials Science 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sensors
#29
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,422
of 432,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sensors
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.