The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental warming under field conditions alters starch multi-structure and flour and starch functionality of late-season indica-japonica hybrid rice in southern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1203172 |
| Authors |
Taotao Yang, Ruoyu Xiong, Haiyuan Wang, Xueming Tan, Shan Huang, Jun Zhang, Bin Zhang, Yanhua Zeng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,381,699
of 23,874,480 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#1,250
of 2,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,234
of 193,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#31
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,874,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.