↓ Skip to main content

STOC Free: An Innovative Framework to Compare Probability of Freedom From Infection in Heterogeneous Control Programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STOC Free: An Innovative Framework to Compare Probability of Freedom From Infection in Heterogeneous Control Programmes
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2019.00133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika M. van Roon, Inge M. G. A. Santman-Berends, David Graham, Simon J. More, Mirjam Nielen, Aurélien Madouasse, Mathilde Mercat, Christine Fourichon, Jörn Gethmann, Jenny Frössling, Ann Lindberg, Carla Correia-Gomes, George J. Gunn, Carola Sauter-Louis, Madeleine K. Henry, Linda van Duijn, Gerdien van Schaik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Mathematics 2 8%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,488,895
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,380
of 6,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,965
of 349,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#34
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.