↓ Skip to main content

Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.651112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing Zhang, Hansen Li, Shilin Bi, Yong Luo, Yang Cao, Guodong Zhang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 45 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 37 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 48 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,589,400
of 24,875,286 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,853
of 15,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,479
of 428,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#193
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.