↓ Skip to main content

E. coli Is a Poor End-Product Criterion for Assessing the General Microbial Risk Posed From Consuming Norovirus Contaminated Shellfish

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
E. coli Is a Poor End-Product Criterion for Assessing the General Microbial Risk Posed From Consuming Norovirus Contaminated Shellfish
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.608888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasmine H. Sharp, Katie Clements, Mallory Diggens, James E. McDonald, Shelagh K. Malham, Davey L. Jones

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Unspecified 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 15%
Unspecified 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#22,823,736
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#27,001
of 29,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#393,151
of 452,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#870
of 961 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 961 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.